<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Giving Molecular Modeling a Second-Life Chance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wideopenmind.com/index.php/2009/10/02/giving-molecular-modeling-a-second-life-chance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wideopenmind.com/index.php/2009/10/02/giving-molecular-modeling-a-second-life-chance/</link>
	<description>A podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 10:51:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://wideopenmind.com/index.php/2009/10/02/giving-molecular-modeling-a-second-life-chance/comment-page-1/#comment-5335</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wideopenmind.com/?p=769#comment-5335</guid>
		<description>There are many fascinating social factors around this, I&#039;m sure. One that comes to mind is the body language differences across oceans. Would masking these actually aid communication in some cases to avoid distraction or even misreads?  How is this a factor among people who already know each other well vs those who have never met?  This side of eternity I think that face to face is superior to mouse to mouse. 

Now when space and time limitations cease to be --- wow!  &quot;No eye has seen, no ear has heard, no mind has conceived what God has prepared for those who love him&quot; and &quot;now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when he appears,[a]we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many fascinating social factors around this, I&#8217;m sure. One that comes to mind is the body language differences across oceans. Would masking these actually aid communication in some cases to avoid distraction or even misreads?  How is this a factor among people who already know each other well vs those who have never met?  This side of eternity I think that face to face is superior to mouse to mouse. </p>
<p>Now when space and time limitations cease to be &#8212; wow!  &#8220;No eye has seen, no ear has heard, no mind has conceived what God has prepared for those who love him&#8221; and &#8220;now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when he appears,[a]we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: popsie</title>
		<link>http://wideopenmind.com/index.php/2009/10/02/giving-molecular-modeling-a-second-life-chance/comment-page-1/#comment-4896</link>
		<dc:creator>popsie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wideopenmind.com/?p=769#comment-4896</guid>
		<description>There are many fascinating social factors around this, I&#039;m sure. One that comes to mind is the body language differences across oceans. Would masking these actually aid communication in some cases to avoid distraction or even misreads?  How is this a factor among people who already know each other well vs those who have never met?  This side of eternity I think that face to face is superior to mouse to mouse. 

Now when space and time limitations cease to be --- wow!  &quot;No eye has seen, no ear has heard, no mind has conceived what God has prepared for those who love him&quot; and &quot;now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when he appears,[a]we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many fascinating social factors around this, I&#8217;m sure. One that comes to mind is the body language differences across oceans. Would masking these actually aid communication in some cases to avoid distraction or even misreads?  How is this a factor among people who already know each other well vs those who have never met?  This side of eternity I think that face to face is superior to mouse to mouse. </p>
<p>Now when space and time limitations cease to be &#8212; wow!  &#8220;No eye has seen, no ear has heard, no mind has conceived what God has prepared for those who love him&#8221; and &#8220;now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when he appears,[a]we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wideopenmind</title>
		<link>http://wideopenmind.com/index.php/2009/10/02/giving-molecular-modeling-a-second-life-chance/comment-page-1/#comment-4766</link>
		<dc:creator>wideopenmind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 02:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wideopenmind.com/?p=769#comment-4766</guid>
		<description>The idea for writing this was confirmed when hearing about the use of OpenSim and knowing Sarah all ready proposed using Second Life at work. Using it for science is a newer concept for me. In a book Sarah let Steve borrow (&quot;How to Wow&quot;), it talked about how most of communication is through non-verbal cues. This leads to the downside of interacting with people via avatars as you mentioned. There aren&#039;t any reactionary facial expressions, so you&#039;re limited to reading sarcasm, joking, and other verbal cues in a text format (communication by instant messaging).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea for writing this was confirmed when hearing about the use of OpenSim and knowing Sarah all ready proposed using Second Life at work. Using it for science is a newer concept for me. In a book Sarah let Steve borrow (&#8221;How to Wow&#8221;), it talked about how most of communication is through non-verbal cues. This leads to the downside of interacting with people via avatars as you mentioned. There aren&#8217;t any reactionary facial expressions, so you&#8217;re limited to reading sarcasm, joking, and other verbal cues in a text format (communication by instant messaging).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: momsie</title>
		<link>http://wideopenmind.com/index.php/2009/10/02/giving-molecular-modeling-a-second-life-chance/comment-page-1/#comment-4764</link>
		<dc:creator>momsie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 04:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wideopenmind.com/?p=769#comment-4764</guid>
		<description>I love the ideology of using second life (kind of what Sarah and team won with at USIS)...but here&#039;s my question:  so much of what is communicated in a boardroom, etc, has to do with body language and facial expression---can avatars assume those in the split second between hearing the words you speak and the sound coming out of the avatar&#039;s mouth?   Or is the avatar less an actual human communicator and more a representation to look at for the hearer, and when he/she replies, they have a symbol of you before them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the ideology of using second life (kind of what Sarah and team won with at USIS)&#8230;but here&#8217;s my question:  so much of what is communicated in a boardroom, etc, has to do with body language and facial expression&#8212;can avatars assume those in the split second between hearing the words you speak and the sound coming out of the avatar&#8217;s mouth?   Or is the avatar less an actual human communicator and more a representation to look at for the hearer, and when he/she replies, they have a symbol of you before them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
